#12。change and continuity _1 (o71o3o)

1.3.1 introduction

Media theorists tend to be polarized over the degree of new media’s newness.
To some extent this argument hinges upon the disciplinary frameworks and discourse within which proponents of either side of the argument work.
The revolutionary is important in Academy but ignore in business.
I think that change is very interesting but it gives us fear.
New thing always needs a fitness term.
Revolution needs in our society, but I think "Have revolution Outlived their Usefulness?"

1.3.2 measuring newness

We need to establish from what previous states thing have changed.
Change and revolution have little same things.
Both mean transform but revolution is more aggressive than change.
That is, revolution means to totally change.
In this textbook, this basic question can help us guard against missing at least three possibilities.
1. How can we know that new thing is made from?2. Familiar in everyday use or consumption we may lose our curiosity, Stop to ask question3. Interactivity

I think that ‘new’ always is given continually.
If newness never have old thing, it can’t keep up long time.
We have to learn newness, if new thing is very new and don’t have continuity.
New thing gives advantages but extreme change or newness brings about confusions.
In conclusion, I think that we need new thing, has continuity.